caspase 3 (Addgene inc)
Structured Review

Caspase 3, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 20 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/caspase 3/product/Addgene inc
Average 92 stars, based on 20 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "A cortical basis for perception of internal gut sensations"
Article Title: A cortical basis for perception of internal gut sensations
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.02.11.705298
Figure Legend Snippet: (a) NG-OxtR + terminals expressing ChRmine-mScarlet innervating the intestine and forming intra-ganglionic-laminar-endings (IGLEs, labeled with white arrows) in both male and female mice. Scale bar = 100 µm. (b) Quantification of lick reduction index during the sucrose consumption task, showing similar responses between male (n = 12 ChRmine+, 5 controls) and female (n = 5 ChRmine+, 2 controls) mice. Bars show mean ± SEM across mice. Males vs. females within the ChRmine+ group: p = 0.8 (Whitney U), males vs. females within the control group: p = 0.38 (Whitney U), and ChRmine+ vs. control overall: p = 1.05×10 −7 (Welch t). (c) Quantification of lick reduction index during the sucrose consumption task in water restricted ChRmine+ (n = 3) and control (n = 5) mice, p = 0.00013 (independent t-test). Bars show mean ± SEM across mice. (d-e) Activation of NG-OxtR + does not cause substantial conditioned taste preference/aversion. (d) Top: schematic of the behavioral apparatus (head-fixed mice licking for grape or apple juice). Bottom: timeline of the experiment. (e) Quantification of lick preference index for each day of the conditioned taste preference experiment (n = 6 mice). Bars show mean ± SEM across mice. As expected from the immediate efect of stimulation to reduce licking, there was a substantial reduction in preference for the juice paired with non-invasive NG-OxtR + optogenetic activation during conditioning from 0.057 to 0.55 (adj.P = 0.03, Wilcoxon with FDR correction). When comparing day 1 and day 5 (pre stimulation vs. post stimulation), there was a very small yet significant decrease from 0.06 to −0.06, likely reflecting our initial biased choice of pairing stimulation with the mildly preferred juice (adj. P = 0.03, Wilcoxon with FDR correction). (f) Left: learning of the vagal opto NoGo task in ChRmine + mice (n=9), but not in control mice (n=5). Values are d’ (discriminability index) over days showing similar performance between vagal opto NoGo (dark red) and vagal opto Go (light red) tasks in ChRmine mice. In contrast, control mice failed to learn the NoGo task over multiple training days (gray). Thicker lines indicate mean ± SEM across mice. Right: d’ calculated for each mouse at the first half of the first session, compared to the last session, shows improved discriminability in the NoGo task with training P = 0.012 (Wilcoxon test). (g-i) NG-OxtR + specific ablation using Caspase 3 hinders behavioral performance in the vagal opto NoGo task. (g) Schematic of the surgical procedure. Retro-AAV-Ef1a-DIO-ChRmine-mScarlet was injected bi-laterally into the NTS of OxtR-Cre mice. Additionally, AAV9-flex-taCasp3-TEVp was injected bi-laterally into the NG to specifically ablate NG-OxtR + neurons. (h) Example histology from two diferent mice demonstrating partial ablation of NG-OxtR + neurons (right), and successful, near-complete, ablation (left). Scale bar = 200 µm. (i) Summary of Hits and FAs in the vagal opto NoGo task of mice without ablation (same plot as , shown for comparison), partial ablation, and near-complete ablation of NG-OxtR + neurons. p = 3.6×10 − (paired t-test, n=19). Middle: mice that underwent bi-lateral NG injections of Caspase 3 but showed partial ablation, p = 8.1×10 −4 (paired t-test, n=3). Right: mice with successful, near-complete ablation of NG-OxtR + neurons, p = 0.129 (paired t-test, n=3). Bars show mean ± SEM across mice (j-k) Previous work using a diferent OxtR-Cre mouse line (BAC transgenic mice) reported that chemogenetic activation of NG-OxtR + neurons induced significant reductions in body temperature, resulting in torpor (also accompanied by changes in blood pressure and heart rate) . In contrast, previous work using the OxtR-t2a-Cre knock-in mouse line we use here, observed no change in body temperature and blood pressure . We therefore also verified this in our preparation. We measured body temperature during performance of the vagal opto NoGo task and did not observe a reduction in body temperature upon NG-OxtR + stimulation, nor other evidence of torpor (j). We also conducted heart rate measurements in anesthetized mice, previously trained on both the NoGo and Go vagal opto tasks (k). We observed heart rate reductions in response to optogenetic activation in some mice but not in others. Most importantly, mice with or without a change in heart rate showed similar high performance in the NoGo and Go tasks. (j) Performance in the vagal opto NoGo task does not induce changes in body temperature. Temperature was measured during the vagal opto NoGo task every 5 min (n = 3 mice). Each mouse’s measurements are indicated in gray, the black line is the mean across mice, and the red rectangle indicates the time of the vagal opto NoGo session. (k) Performance in the vagal opto NoGo and Go tasks is independent of potential changes in heart rate. Heart rate measurements in anesthetized mice during NG-OxtR + optogenetic stimulation (same stimulation parameters as in the behavioral task). Top: example of two mice without a change in heart rate in response to the optogenetic stimulation. Bottom: example of two mice with a reduction in heart rate in response to the optogenetic stimulation. In the electrocardiogram traces, each peak indicates one heartbeat, and each red horizontal line indicates 4 sec of vagal optogenetic stimulation. All mice had similarly high performance in the vagal opto NoGo and vagal opto Go tasks, regardless of whether there was a change in heart rate. Red rectangles indicate optogenetic stimulation time, and gray rectangles indicate odor cue presentation. Gray ticks indicate licks.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Labeling, Control, Activation Assay, Injection, Comparison, Transgenic Assay, Knock-In

